Nominations are Open!

[polyexmod]

Nominations are now open here! They will close on March 27th, at 23:59 UTC. (Countdown | What time is that for me?)

Each person can nominate up to 10 fandoms with up to 10 relationships in each, and up to 10 freeform tags.

A relationship qualifies for this exchange if it contains more than two people. There is no maximum limit to the number of people allowed in a nominated relationship (except by character limits on AO3 tags).

The freeform tags in this exchange should be used for nominating poly relationship dynamics; i.e. sedoretu, V-shaped threesomes, equilateral relationships, etc. Please try to avoid making these too specific! There may be some cleanup/merging of freeform tags which overlap, but I'll be leaving most things as-nominated so please check the tagset before you nominate.

Crossover relationships can be nominated under the fandom 'Crossover Fandom', and Original Works relationships under the fandom 'Original Work'.

Keep an eye on this comm for nomination clarifications and queries!

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Is it possible to nominate relationships where one part of the ship is a group and the other is singular character? Like: Warriors/Healer (just an example that fits some of my fandoms.) I intend this for ot4-ot5 ships with the dynamics "several characters/character A" which I don't know if it has a name or not. /o\

[polyexmod]

Yes, that would be fine!

[(Anonymous)]

Do you have a preference about whether Doctor Who is all one big fandom, or split into (1963), (2005) and various spinoffs?

[polyexmod]

No preference - whichever you (and other nominators) prefer. If there is a nominator who'd like them in a different format I'll add it to a nominations query post.

[(Anonymous)]

I'll go for all-one-big-fandom, then, as there are several ships I can imagine people being interested in that would otherwise be crossovers between different parts of canon. Not sure if I'll end up nominating any of them myself yet, though.

[(Anonymous)]

Same anon

Looks like someone else has gone down the fragmented route already ... (My noms got bounced back for crossing over with theirs in a different fandom.) I've used up a few more slots and fitted in with that.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm confused about the "queerplatonic/diamoric relationships" freeform. Queerplatonic and diamoric are two different concepts; the former refers to relationships between platonic and romantic while the latter refers to relationships involving non-binary people.

Is that level of granularity supposed to be encouraged? Should I nominate "Queerplatonic/femslash relationships"? Because I figured that the gender combinations of relationships would be clear enough from the relationships themselves.

[(Anonymous)]

Thank you.

[(Anonymous)]

It's not like there are canonically many NB characters. Maybe the person who nominated it wants to see a queerplatonic relationships where all the people in the ship(s) they request are NB.

[polyexmod]

I'll add it to the nominations clarification post! You're correct in saying I would prefer to leave gender more generalised than specific, but I'll see what the nominator has to say.